The fourth episode of my podcast is available now. Have a listen here:
Click on the image below to visit Clara’s website.
Every qualified teacher was once a student teacher on placement. A huge part of the experience involves the host teacher – whomever that is, it is generally out of the control of the student. It is important for the host teacher to have the correct frame of mind if she decides to offer her class to a student on placement.
Here are a number of suggestions for teachers who will host a student or who will at some point consider it:
This is not an exhaustive list and they are my own views on how to help students on placement. If you can add to the above suggestions or would like to suggest amendments, please feel free to leave a comment below.
I’m currently reading a very insightful book called “Become the Primary Teacher Everyone Wants to Have” (a new book by Seán Delaney) and although I’ve only read eighteen pages so far, something he wrote caught my attention. Delaney refers to a culture in our teaching profession of using the internet to source schemes of work.
“… sharing schemes of work can lead to producing or reproducing notes you have little ownership of and that are geared towards children in a different setting. Acquired schemes may be a solution to someone else’s teaching problems but not to yours.” (2017, p. 10)
I thought about what he had written and it reinforced my existing opinion. While teachers can find inspiration in lesson ideas, I believe that they should use their professional ability to construct their own lessons suited to their pupils’ situation. Sharing, buying or selling schemes of work or lesson plans for the sole purpose of implementing without change or without casting a critical eye over takes away from the professionalism of teachers. It can lead to a view that once you have your step-by-step instructions, anybody can do it. The reality of teaching is that the one-size-fits-all approach does not work.
During my first year as a teacher, I would have taught a certain way. I’m now in my eighth year in the profession and I’m happy enough to say that I’ve improved as an educator. That’s not to suggest that I was a bad teacher during Year One, rather I was a beginner teacher with limited experience, a teacher prepared to take chances, make mistakes, reflect and learn. I’m still prepared to do all of those things but what’s most important is that I learn from my own actions and experiences first and foremost. This would be very difficult to do if I was following someone else’s instructions. My own development as a teacher depends on how I look at my own practice.
Getting back to the creation of schemes of work or lesson plans for the purposes of dissemination to others, this is something that can tempt the newer teacher or the trainee teacher. A person in that situation won’t have the benefit of post-qualification, professional experience and may be inclined to look for a quick-fix. For the purposes of improvement and professional development, reflecting on another person’s lesson can’t compare to reflecting on your own lesson. Create your own plans, improve upon your own errors and be better off for it.
I recently read a blog post on another primary teacher’s website about how to teach a Mathematics lesson while on Teaching Practice. While full of good intent no doubt, I found the advice to be incomplete and therefore unhelpful to the impressionable student teacher. To summarise, the advice consisted of the following:
On first glance, this might look okay. Many teachers may have started out in their careers teaching Mathematics this way. However, experience; reflection; and professional development have taught me differently. I don’t claim to be the ultimate authority on teaching, but at this stage of my career I can identify a flawed process.
The main issue I have with this lesson is its lack of discussion at the beginning of the lesson – the discussion, limited as it is, is tucked away at the end of the suggested lesson. Mathematics is ultimately a mental activity where the goal is to be able to think automatically about what skill needs to be used to solve a problem. The beginning of a Mathematics lesson should be an opportunity for children to talk about what they already know and to incorporate a new problem into the discussion. At this stage the children should be encouraged to think. The quickest and most effective way to make sure that this is happening is to encourage the children to articulate their thinking.
This is where failure comes in. The children should be encouraged to say what they think, without fear of failure. Where mistakes are made, lessons are learned. This can be done in a comfortable way for children, not by saying “that’s right” or “that’s wrong” but rather by asking them how they worked out their answer, what skills they chose and why, regardless of the answer they give. Teaching is about a lot more than ‘chalk and talk’ – it is about encouraging children to be problem-solvers. Finally, instead of just asking the children what they have learned, ask them how they learned it and why they think it will be useful. The quality of learning suffers when it is confined to the ‘repeat after me’ approach.
Six weeks ago, I wrote about my desire to learn a new language. I chose to learn Spanish and I discussed how I planned to do this. I initially planned on using a combination of Rosetta Stone, Duolingo, SpanishPod101.com podcasts, the HelloTalk app and conversation groups in my local library. I have whittled this down to Rosetta Stone, sporadic use of HelloTalk and a weekly Spanish conversation group in Raheny Library every Monday night from 6:30pm to 8:00pm.
It has been an ambition of mine for many years to learn a new language. I currently speak Gaeilge and English fluently, and I learned some very basic French during my time in secondary school. I can just about hold a very simple, practical conversation in French. After 6 years of learning French, this disappoints me. It would be very easy for me to lay blame everywhere and anywhere other than at myself, but that wouldn’t be productive. Anyway, that’s not what this blog post is about. After much reading online about learning languages, I have decided to learn a new language every year (for the next few years anyway).
I have decided to begin by learning Spanish because I love how it sounds. My goal is to spend at least 30 minutes a day engaging with a language learning activity and to be able to hold a normal conversation in Spanish at the end of 3 months. I have made a few attempts in the past with Spanish, but due to lack of engagement or lack of motivation, I have never progressed beyond some basics.
My plan is to use what is currently available to me. About 5 years ago, I purchased all 5 levels of the Rosetta Stone language learning programme (for a considerable price) and as mentioned previously, I started with the basics of it but didn’t take it any further. I will return to this programme and I will commit to sticking with it and seeing it through. I’m also using the Duolingo app as well as listening to podcasts from SpanishPod101.com in an effort to learn the language on the go, or while just relaxing on the couch. Finally, but most importantly, I plan to engage in a language exchange with a native speaker. In today’s connected world, this will be relatively easy to do, and I will be availing of the HelloTalk app to assist me with this. I’ll also seek out conversation groups in my local libraries. This element of langauge learning should never be overlooked due to the fact that a language is useless in isolation! I can study it all I want, but if I never use it for a real purpose, my goal will be doomed to failure.
The only real issue I have with Duolingo and SpanishPod101 is that they are translation-based. This is more of a failing for Duolingo as it is an audio-visual app and could have easily avoided it during the design process, but is less avoidable for SpanishPod101 as it is purely audio-based and meaning must be made somehow.
The reason I think that Rosetta Stone will be my best language-learning experience (outside of actual real conversation) is that there is no translation – it is all done in the target language with visual and audio aids. It also comes with a handy USB headset which can be used to input your own speech so that pronunciation is analysed and either accepted or rejected from the point of view of being allowed to progress.
Based on the advice of Benny Lewis, I have decided to be as public as I can be about my language learning – it’ll be a lot more difficult to make excuses to give up on it if I tell everyone about it!
As a positive side-effect to learning a new language, I will be firmly in the shoes of the learner, which will give me a richer insight into what it can be like for children to learn a language – specifically the difficulties, frustrations and challenges they face. As a primary school teacher, this sort of insight will be of great benefit to my approach to children as they learn Irish, as well as to children whose first language is not English.
I will revisit this topic in one month with an update on my progress! If anyone knows of any useful (and free) Spanish language-learning aids, please share by leaving a comment and let me know.
For those of you who know me well or who worked with me around four years ago, you’ll know that I took a chance and unsuccessfully ran in the Teaching Council elections for the Dublin constituency back in early 2012. I can categorically state that I will not be running in the 2016 elections. However, the experience taught me something. Apathy among teachers towards the Teaching Council was massive.
Last time around, between 7% and 8% of all registered teachers in Ireland voted in the elections. I can’t say I blame the 92% of teachers who decided not to vote. Apathy was a huge issue 4 years ago and I don’t believe that much has changed since then. The difference this year is that TC registration is now compulsory for all teachers and voting will be online for the first time, instead of a postal ballot which was the case previously. It will be interesting to see how this affects apathy and subsequent engagement with the voting process.
Some prospective candidates have already made their intentions clear via social media, which is to be commended. Although registering as a candidate won’t officially commence until early January, there’s no harm in preparing early and getting word out there. My hope for this round of candidates is that there will be a significant difference between those that have gone before them and what they will be able to offer us for the next 4 years. The only reason I know the names of some elected members of the Teaching Council is because I was heavily involved in the process 4 years ago. To the average teacher, they may not know the names of their elected members, that there even was an election 4 years ago, or that there is one coming up in February. Lack of communication between the TC and teachers was a talking point for many when candidates put themselves forward previously. If the next group of elected members are to even hope to change that, they must focus on putting that sort of talk into action.
I plan on revisiting this topic in the New Year, when candidates have been confirmed. I have something interesting in mind so watch this space!
My undergraduate education began in 2002 when I enrolled in University College Dublin to study Gaeilge and Music (Information Studies during my first year). I only wish I had written this blog post or jotted down my thoughts on the topic of ‘Do University Lecturers Teach?’ back then as certain things get lost from memory to time.
What I do remember quite clearly though is bad teaching. This is not to suggest that every lecturer was bad at teaching, there were some inspirational ones, but the bad ones stood out then and still do now. How do I define a bad lecturer? I’ll confine this to my undergraduate experience as my postgraduate experiences were quite different.
A bad lecturer reads from the €70 book that is on the required reading list for the module. This can last for the full ‘lecture’ and offers no opportunity for engagement from the students, as well as no audio/visual aids or examples to enhance instruction.
A bad lecturer in a small group setting will make no effort to discuss the topic. To me a discussion is a conversation between two or more people. A bad lecturer’s view of teaching is talking from the top of his intellect with an expectation that students will learn something from this.
A good lecturer interacts. He asks relevant questions. He answers questions thoughtfully. He invites opinions. He invites disagreement. He invites debate. He invites correction! Fortunately, I got to see this in action on a few occasions.
I’m a firm believer that every third-level employee who has lecturing hours should be required to undertake a mandatory course in teaching/lecturing skills. Some universities offer such a course (UCD; Maynooth; and there are probably more), however it is not a mandatory requirement for the lecturing staff.
I believe the outcomes of such a course for lecturers would be of most benefit to students in their first year of study. The transition from school to third level can be a tricky one for some, and if such people experienced good quality lecturing in the initial stages, the potential for dropping out could be lowered. There’s always the argument that the student in university is in charge of his own learning, and I agree to a point. But when there’s a job to be done by lecturers, it should be done properly, and not merely as an afterthought.
Every year I make an effort to return to Marino Institute of Education to do one of their summer courses and I’ve always been impressed. Two of the courses I’ve been most impressed with have been Brendan Culligan’s ‘Learning Difficulties – Literacy’ and David Ruddy’s online ‘Teacher and the Law’.
This year I decided to do ‘Observing Teaching, Children and Mathematics’, with Dr. Seán Delaney as course tutor. I originally tried to enrol in this course 3 years ago but that particular course ended up not going ahead that year. This year I was delighted that it did. If you ever consider booking this course in the future, here are a few reasons why you should do it:
Our course tutor was quick to point out this was not to be seen as ‘model’ teaching, rather it was ‘public’ teaching. This is an important point in that this summer course is a teaching ‘lab’ of sorts, and that participants are free to question why the course tutor did what he did, in fact this was encouraged by our course tutor at the beginning of our first day. We also had opportunities to discuss the pupils’ reactions to Seán’s various approaches to the topics taught throughout the week and how we thought they learned best.
What I noticed most from this course was that the tutor strongly encouraged ‘mathematical thinking’ amongst the primary school pupils present. There was very little ‘instructing’ them how to do something and the majority of the pupils’ learning came from their own discovery through collaboration, discussion and investigation. It would be safe to say that the course tutor allowed the pupils to do most of the talking. The massive benefit of this was that through the development of mathematical thinking skills, they could use this way of thinking to apply to future mathematical problems, as opposed to memorising something that they were being ‘taught’ by the simplest (and worst) of methodologies – explanation. Memorising something is very unreliable and does not encourage real mathematical thinking and problem-solving skills.
I would highly recommend this summer course to absolutely any primary school teacher. It is not something that could be done online, the benefits of this course can only be realised through an onsite environment. You’ll learn the foundations of mathematics knowledge and methodologies during your initial teacher training, but you’ll learn a great deal more about how children learn mathematics if you sign up to this course. It’s definitely worth it.
From September 2014, any postgraduate trainee teacher just starting their course would have enrolled on a 2-year Professional Master of Education (Level 9 degree on the NFQ). Prior to this, the 18-month Higher/Graduate Diploma in Education (NFQ Level 8) was sufficient. The change for undergraduate trainee teachers was that all B.Ed. courses must increase from 3 years to 4 years (remains at NFQ Level 8). Overall, there is no difference to what each course trains you to do.
The change from Level 8 to Level 9 for the postgraduate courses raises some issues.
This creates two-tier teacher training. Teachers qualified at both levels will be trained to do the same job but there will not be equivalence of experience, achievement or outcome. A master’s degree should have a strong research element and while the PME (and now the B.Ed.) will have a minor dissertation element, I do not believe that it is comparable. An M.Ed. requires a number of years of teaching experience as a pre-requisite to entry into the course so that students will have a solid grounding in educational practice, therefore they will be deemed capable of presenting their work at a higher level. This will be missing for PME students.
Whatever the arguments are for or against lengthening these training courses, the big issue here is the reclassification to master’s level. All these issues could have been avoided if the new two-year course was still classified as a Higher/Graduate Diploma in Education at NFQ Level 8. There is no reason why this could not have been the case. Next year we will begin to see the implications of this decision.
Starting discussions; encouraging critical thinking
Brain food for the thinking teacher
Teacher of English and French blogs about Irish education
"Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." - As W. B. Yeats never said
for teachers who engage, inspire and have fun.
Starting discussions; encouraging critical thinking
Learning to be a teacher, one day at a time...
“For a small child there is no division between playing and learning; between the things he or she does ‘just for fun’ and things that are ‘educational.’ The child learns while living and any part of living that is enjoyable is also play. ~ Penelope Leach